Year | Type | Turnout | Winner | Runner-Up |
Other | Total Votes |
2024 |
G |
61% |
Kelly Armstrong (R) |
247,056 |
68.3% |
Merrill Piepkorn (D) |
94,043 |
26.0% |
20,852 [+] |
5.8% |
361,951 |
[-] Other candidates in 2024 included:
Michael Coachman (I) 20,322 (5.6%);
|
2024 |
S1 |
61% |
Kevin Cramer* (R) |
241,569 |
66.3% |
Katrina Christiansen (D) |
121,602 |
33.4% |
1,156 |
0.3% |
364,327 |
[-] Other candidates in 2024 included:
|
2022 |
S3 |
40% |
John Hoeven* (R) |
135,474 |
56.4% |
Katrina Christiansen (D) |
59,995 |
25.0% |
44,671 [+] |
18.6% |
240,140 |
[-] Other candidates in 2022 included:
Rick Becker (I) 44,406 (18.5%);
|
2020 |
G |
59% |
Doug Burgum* (R) |
235,479 |
65.8% |
Shelley Lenz (D) |
90,789 |
25.4% |
31,391 [+] |
8.8% |
357,659 |
[-] Other candidates in 2020 included:
DuWayne Hendrickson (Libertarian) 13,853 (3.9%);
|
|
2018 |
S1 |
55% |
Kevin Cramer (R) |
179,720 |
55.1% |
Heidi Heitkamp* (D) |
144,376 |
44.3% |
2,042 |
0.6% |
326,138 |
[-] Other candidates in 2018 included:
|
2016 |
G |
59% |
Doug Burgum (R) |
259,863 |
76.5% |
Marvin Nelson (D) |
65,855 |
19.4% |
13,883 [+] |
4.1% |
339,601 |
[-] Other candidates in 2016 included:
Marty Riske (Libertarian) 13,230 (3.9%);
|
2016 |
S3 |
60% |
John Hoeven* (R) |
268,788 |
78.5% |
Eliot Glassheim (D) |
58,116 |
17.0% |
15,597 [+] |
4.6% |
342,501 |
[-] Other candidates in 2016 included:
Robert Marquette (Libertarian) 10,556 (3.1%);
James Germalic (I) 4,675 (1.4%);
|
2012 |
G |
59% |
Jack Dalrymple* (R) |
200,526 |
63.1% |
Ryan Taylor (D) |
109,048 |
34.3% |
8,238 [+] |
2.6% |
317,812 |
[-] Other candidates in 2012 included:
Paul Sorum (I) 5,356 (1.7%);
Roland Riemers (I) 2,616 (0.8%);
|
2012 |
S1 |
60% |
Heidi Heitkamp (D) |
161,337 |
50.2% |
Rick Berg (R) |
158,401 |
49.3% |
1,406 |
0.4% |
321,144 |
[-] Other candidates in 2012 included:
|
2010 |
S3 |
46% |
John Hoeven (R) |
181,689 |
76.1% |
Tracy Potter (D) |
52,955 |
22.2% |
4,168 [+] |
1.7% |
238,812 |
[-] Other candidates in 2010 included:
Keith Hanson (Libertarian) 3,890 (1.6%);
|
|
2008 |
G |
63% |
John Hoeven* (R) |
235,009 |
74.4% |
Tim Mathern (D) |
74,279 |
23.5% |
6,404 [+] |
2.0% |
315,692 |
[-] Other candidates in 2008 included:
DuWayne Hendrickson (I) 6,404 (2.0%);
|
2006 |
S1 |
44% |
Kent Conrad* (D) |
150,146 |
68.8% |
Dwight Grotberg (R) |
64,417 |
29.5% |
3,589 [+] |
1.6% |
218,152 |
[-] Other candidates in 2006 included:
Roland Riemers (I) 2,194 (1.0%);
James Germalic (I) 1,395 (0.6%);
|
2004 |
S3 |
63% |
Byron Dorgan* (D) |
212,143 |
68.3% |
Mike Liffrig (R) |
98,553 |
31.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
310,696 |
[-] Other candidates in 2004 included:
|
2004 |
G |
63% |
John Hoeven* (R) |
220,803 |
71.3% |
Joseph Satrom (D) |
84,877 |
27.4% |
4,193 [+] |
1.4% |
309,873 |
[-] Other candidates in 2004 included:
Roland Riemers (I) 4,193 (1.4%);
|
2000 |
S1 |
60% |
Kent Conrad* (D) |
176,470 |
61.4% |
Duane Sand (R) |
111,069 |
38.6% |
0 |
0.0% |
287,539 |
[-] Other candidates in 2000 included:
|
2000 |
G |
60% |
John Hoeven (R) |
159,255 |
55.0% |
Heidi Heitkamp (D) |
130,144 |
45.0% |
13 |
0.0% |
289,412 |
[-] Other candidates in 2000 included:
|
|
1998 |
S3 |
46% |
Byron Dorgan* (D) |
134,747 |
63.2% |
Donna Nalewaja (R) |
75,013 |
35.2% |
3,598 [+] |
1.7% |
213,358 |
[-] Other candidates in 1998 included:
Harley McLain (Reform) 3,598 (1.7%);
|
1996 |
G |
57% |
Ed Schafer* (R) |
174,937 |
66.2% |
Lee Kaldor (D) |
89,349 |
33.8% |
12 |
0.0% |
264,298 |
[-] Other candidates in 1996 included:
|
1994 |
S1 |
51% |
Kent Conrad* (D) |
137,157 |
58.0% |
Ben Clayburgh (R) |
99,390 |
42.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
236,547 |
[-] Other candidates in 1994 included:
|
1992 |
S1 |
35% |
Kent Conrad (D) |
103,246 |
63.2% |
Jack Dalrymple (R) |
55,194 |
33.8% |
4,871 [+] |
3.0% |
163,311 |
[-] Other candidates in 1992 included:
Darold Larson (Libertarian) 4,871 (3.0%);
|
1992 |
G |
66% |
Ed Schafer (R) |
176,398 |
57.9% |
Nicholas Spaeth (D) |
123,845 |
40.6% |
4,618 [+] |
1.5% |
304,861 |
[-] Other candidates in 1992 included:
Harley McLain (I) 2,614 (0.9%);
Michael DuPaul (I) 2,004 (0.7%);
|
1992 |
S3 |
66% |
Byron Dorgan (D) |
179,347 |
59.0% |
Steve Sydness (R) |
118,162 |
38.9% |
6,448 [+] |
2.1% |
303,957 |
[-] Other candidates in 1992 included:
Tom Asbridge (I) 6,448 (2.1%);
|
|
1988 |
G |
65% |
George Sinner* (D) |
179,094 |
59.9% |
Leon Malberg (R) |
119,986 |
40.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
299,080 |
[-] Other candidates in 1988 included:
|
1988 |
S1 |
63% |
Quentin Burdick* (D) |
171,899 |
59.4% |
Earl Strinden (R) |
112,937 |
39.1% |
4,334 [+] |
1.5% |
289,170 |
[-] Other candidates in 1988 included:
Kenneth Gardner (Libertarian) 4,334 (1.5%);
|
1986 |
S3 |
63% |
Kent Conrad (D) |
143,932 |
49.8% |
Mark Andrews* (R) |
141,797 |
49.1% |
3,269 [+] |
1.1% |
288,998 |
[-] Other candidates in 1986 included:
Anna Bourgois (I) 3,269 (1.1%);
|
1984 |
G |
68% |
George Sinner (D) |
173,922 |
55.3% |
Allen Olson* (R) |
140,460 |
44.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
314,382 |
[-] Other candidates in 1984 included:
|
1982 |
S1 |
56% |
Quentin Burdick* (D) |
164,873 |
62.8% |
Gene Knorr (R) |
89,304 |
34.0% |
8,288 [+] |
3.2% |
262,465 |
[-] Other candidates in 1982 included:
Anna Bourgois (I) 8,288 (3.2%);
|
1980 |
G |
65% |
Allen Olson (R) |
162,230 |
53.6% |
Arthur Link* (D) |
140,391 |
46.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
302,621 |
[-] Other candidates in 1980 included:
|
1980 |
S3 |
64% |
Mark Andrews* (R) |
210,347 |
70.3% |
Kent Johanneson (D) |
86,658 |
29.0% |
2,267 [+] |
0.8% |
299,272 |
[-] Other candidates in 1980 included:
Harley McLain (Chemical Farming Banned) 1,625 (0.5%);
Don Klingensmith (Statesman) 642 (0.2%);
|
|
1976 |
S1 |
67% |
Quentin Burdick* (D) |
175,772 |
62.1% |
Robert Stroup (R) |
103,466 |
36.6% |
3,824 [+] |
1.4% |
283,062 |
[-] Other candidates in 1976 included:
Clarence Haggard (American) 3,824 (1.4%);
|
1976 |
G |
70% |
Arthur Link* (D) |
153,309 |
51.6% |
Richard Elkin (R) |
138,221 |
46.5% |
5,619 [+] |
1.9% |
297,149 |
[-] Other candidates in 1976 included:
Martin Vaaler (American) 5,619 (1.9%);
|
1974 |
S3 |
61% |
Milton Young* (R) |
114,852 |
48.4% |
William Guy (D) |
114,675 |
48.4% |
7,532 [+] |
3.2% |
237,059 |
[-] Other candidates in 1974 included:
James Jungroth (I) 6,679 (2.8%);
Kenneth Gardner (Freedom & Liberty) 853 (0.4%);
|
1972 |
G |
68% |
Arthur Link (D) |
143,899 |
51.0% |
Richard Larsen (R) |
138,032 |
49.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
281,931 |
[-] Other candidates in 1972 included:
|
1970 |
S1 |
58% |
Quentin Burdick* (D) |
134,519 |
61.3% |
Thomas Kleppe (R) |
82,996 |
37.8% |
2,045 [+] |
0.9% |
219,560 |
[-] Other candidates in 1970 included:
Russell Kleppe (I) 2,045 (0.9%);
|
|
1968 |
S3 |
68% |
Milton Young* (R) |
154,968 |
64.6% |
Herschel Lashkowitz (D) |
80,815 |
33.7% |
3,993 [+] |
1.7% |
239,776 |
[-] Other candidates in 1968 included:
Duane Mutch (Taxpayers Revival Ticket) 3,993 (1.7%);
|
1968 |
G |
70% |
William Guy* (D) |
135,955 |
54.8% |
Robert McCarney (R) |
108,382 |
43.7% |
3,663 [+] |
1.5% |
248,000 |
[-] Other candidates in 1968 included:
Leo Lansberger (Taxpayers Revival Ticket) 3,663 (1.5%);
|
1964 |
S1 |
73% |
Quentin Burdick* (D) |
149,264 |
57.6% |
Thomas Kleppe (R) |
109,681 |
42.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
258,945 |
[-] Other candidates in 1964 included:
|
1964 |
G |
74% |
William Guy* (D) |
146,414 |
55.7% |
Don Halcrow (R) |
116,247 |
44.3% |
0 |
0.0% |
262,661 |
[-] Other candidates in 1964 included:
|
1962 |
S3 |
63% |
Milton Young* (R) |
135,705 |
60.7% |
William Lanier (D) |
88,032 |
39.3% |
0 |
0.0% |
223,737 |
[-] Other candidates in 1962 included:
|
1962 |
G |
64% |
William Guy* (D) |
115,258 |
50.4% |
Mark Andrews (R) |
113,251 |
49.6% |
0 |
0.0% |
228,509 |
[-] Other candidates in 1962 included:
|
1960 |
G |
77% |
William Guy (D) |
136,148 |
49.4% |
C.P. Dahl (R) |
122,486 |
44.5% |
16,741 [+] |
6.1% |
275,375 |
[-] Other candidates in 1960 included:
Herschel Lashkowitz (I) 16,741 (6.1%);
|
1960 |
S1 |
59% |
Quentin Burdick (D) |
104,593 |
49.7% |
John Davis (R) |
103,475 |
49.2% |
2,281 [+] |
1.1% |
210,349 |
[-] Other candidates in 1960 included:
Eugene Van Der Hoeven (I) 1,337 (0.6%);
Clarence Haggard (I) 944 (0.4%);
|
|
1958 |
G |
57% |
John Davis* (R) |
111,836 |
53.1% |
John Lord (D) |
98,763 |
46.9% |
0 |
0.0% |
210,599 |
[-] Other candidates in 1958 included:
|
1958 |
S1 |
55% |
William Langer* (R) |
117,070 |
57.2% |
Raymond Vendsel (D) |
84,892 |
41.5% |
2,673 [+] |
1.3% |
204,635 |
[-] Other candidates in 1958 included:
Arthur Townley (I) 1,700 (0.8%);
Custer Solem (I) 973 (0.5%);
|
1956 |
G |
68% |
John Davis (R) |
147,566 |
58.5% |
Wallace Warner (D) |
104,869 |
41.5% |
0 |
0.0% |
252,435 |
[-] Other candidates in 1956 included:
|
1956 |
S3 |
66% |
Milton Young* (R) |
155,305 |
63.6% |
Quentin Burdick (D) |
87,919 |
36.0% |
937 [+] |
0.4% |
244,161 |
[-] Other candidates in 1956 included:
Arthur Townley (IR) 937 (0.4%);
|
1954 |
G |
52% |
Norman Brunsdale* (R) |
124,253 |
64.2% |
Cornelius Bymers (D) |
69,248 |
35.8% |
0 |
0.0% |
193,501 |
[-] Other candidates in 1954 included:
|
1952 |
G |
69% |
Norman Brunsdale* (R) |
199,944 |
78.7% |
Ole Johnson (D) |
53,990 |
21.3% |
0 |
0.0% |
253,934 |
[-] Other candidates in 1952 included:
|
1952 |
S1 |
65% |
William Langer* (R) |
157,907 |
66.3% |
Harold Morrison (D) |
55,347 |
23.3% |
24,741 [+] |
10.4% |
237,995 |
[-] Other candidates in 1952 included:
Fred Aandahl (I (write-in)) 24,741 (10.4%);
|
1950 |
S3 |
51% |
Milton Young* (R) |
126,209 |
67.6% |
Harry O'Brien (D) |
60,507 |
32.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
186,716 |
[-] Other candidates in 1950 included:
|
1950 |
G |
50% |
Norman Brunsdale (R) |
121,822 |
66.3% |
Clyde Byerly (D) |
61,950 |
33.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
183,772 |
[-] Other candidates in 1950 included:
|
|
1948 |
G |
59% |
Fred Aandahl* (R) |
131,764 |
61.3% |
Howard Henry (D) |
80,655 |
37.5% |
2,539 [+] |
1.2% |
214,958 |
[-] Other candidates in 1948 included:
H.A. Porter (Progressive) 1,873 (0.9%);
George Lund (Socialist) 666 (0.3%);
|
1946 |
G |
46% |
Fred Aandahl* (R) |
116,672 |
68.9% |
Quentin Burdick (D) |
52,719 |
31.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
169,391 |
[-] Other candidates in 1946 included:
|
1946 |
S1 |
45% |
William Langer* (R) |
88,210 |
53.3% |
Arthur Thompson (IR) |
38,804 |
23.5% |
38,368 [+] |
23.2% |
165,382 |
[-] Other candidates in 1946 included:
Abner Larson (D) 38,368 (23.2%);
|
1946 |
S3 |
37% |
Milton Young (R) |
75,998 |
55.5% |
William Lanier (D) |
37,507 |
27.4% |
23,321 [+] |
17.0% |
136,826 |
[-] Other candidates in 1946 included:
Gerald Nye (I) 20,848 (15.2%);
E.A. Johansson (I) 2,473 (1.8%);
|
1944 |
G |
56% |
Fred Aandahl (R) |
107,863 |
52.0% |
William DePuy (D) |
59,961 |
28.9% |
39,605 [+] |
19.1% |
207,429 |
[-] Other candidates in 1944 included:
Alvin Strutz (Independent Republican) 38,997 (18.8%);
A.M. Wiley (Prohibition) 539 (0.3%);
|
1944 |
S3 |
57% |
John Moses (D) |
95,102 |
45.2% |
Gerald Nye* (R) |
69,530 |
33.0% |
45,790 [+] |
21.8% |
210,422 |
[-] Other candidates in 1944 included:
Lynn Stambaugh (Independent Republican) 44,596 (21.2%);
Bernhard O'Loughlin (I) 705 (0.3%);
L.D. Harris (I) 489 (0.2%);
|
1942 |
G |
47% |
John Moses* (D) |
101,390 |
57.6% |
Oscar Hagen (R) |
74,577 |
42.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
175,967 |
[-] Other candidates in 1942 included:
|
1940 |
G |
74% |
John Moses* (D) |
173,278 |
63.1% |
Jack Patterson (R) |
101,287 |
36.9% |
0 |
0.0% |
274,565 |
[-] Other candidates in 1940 included:
|
1940 |
S1 |
71% |
William Langer (R) |
100,647 |
38.1% |
William Lemke (Progressive Republican) |
92,593 |
35.1% |
70,861 [+] |
26.8% |
264,101 |
[-] Other candidates in 1940 included:
Charles Vogel (D) 69,847 (26.4%);
Jasper Haaland (Peace) 1,014 (0.4%);
|
|
1938 |
S3 |
76% |
Gerald Nye* (R) |
131,907 |
50.1% |
William Langer (I) |
112,007 |
42.6% |
19,244 [+] |
7.3% |
263,158 |
[-] Other candidates in 1938 included:
J.J. Nygaard (D) 19,244 (7.3%);
|
1938 |
G |
76% |
John Moses (D) |
138,270 |
52.5% |
John Hagan (R) |
125,246 |
47.5% |
0 |
0.0% |
263,516 |
[-] Other candidates in 1938 included:
|
1936 |
G |
79% |
William Langer (NPL) |
98,750 |
35.8% |
Walter Welford* (R) |
95,697 |
34.7% |
81,366 [+] |
29.5% |
275,813 |
[-] Other candidates in 1936 included:
John Moses (D) 80,726 (29.3%);
Pat Barrett (Communist) 331 (0.1%);
L.J. Wehe (Progressive) 309 (0.1%);
|
Year | Type | Turnout | Winner | Runner-Up |
Other | Total Votes |
|
2024 |
AUD |
59% |
Josh Gallion* (R) |
241,270 |
68.7% |
Tim Lamb (D) |
108,962 |
31.0% |
761 |
0.2% |
350,993 |
[-] Other candidates in 2024:
|
2024 |
INS |
52% |
Jon Godfread* (R) |
302,532 |
98.2% |
|
|
|
5,414 |
1.8% |
307,946 |
[-] Other candidates in 2024:
|
2024 |
LG |
0% |
Michelle Strinden (R) |
0 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
[-] Other candidates in 2024:
Lydia Gessele (I) 0 (?%);
|
2024 |
SPI |
55% |
Kirsten Baesler* (R) |
185,318 |
56.9% |
Jason Heitkamp (R) |
138,085 |
42.4% |
2,316 |
0.7% |
325,719 |
[-] Other candidates in 2024:
|
2024 |
TRE |
52% |
Thomas Beadle* (R) |
303,730 |
98.1% |
|
|
|
5,952 |
1.9% |
309,682 |
[-] Other candidates in 2024:
|
|
2022 |
AG |
39% |
Drew Wrigley* (R) |
166,517 |
70.9% |
Timothy Lamb (D) |
67,609 |
28.8% |
576 |
0.2% |
234,702 |
[-] Other candidates in 2022:
|
2022 |
AGR |
39% |
Doug Goehring* (R) |
177,443 |
75.7% |
Fintan Dooley (D) |
56,654 |
24.2% |
408 |
0.2% |
234,505 |
[-] Other candidates in 2022:
|
2022 |
SOS |
39% |
Michael Howe (R) |
147,816 |
63.2% |
Jeffrey Powell (D) |
64,254 |
27.5% |
21,758 [+] |
9.3% |
233,828 |
[-] Other candidates in 2022:
Charles Tuttle (I) 21,517 (9.2%);
|
2022 |
TAX |
33% |
Brian Kroshus* (R) |
191,278 |
98.0% |
|
|
|
3,812 |
2.0% |
195,090 |
[-] Other candidates in 2022:
|
|
2020 |
AUD |
57% |
Josh Gallion* (R) |
234,293 |
67.7% |
Patrick Hart (D) |
111,243 |
32.1% |
579 |
0.2% |
346,115 |
[-] Other candidates in 2020:
|
2020 |
INS |
50% |
Jon Godfread* (R) |
295,095 |
97.7% |
|
|
|
6,813 |
2.3% |
301,908 |
[-] Other candidates in 2020:
|
2020 |
LG |
0% |
Brent Sanford* (R) |
0 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
[-] Other candidates in 2020:
Joshua Voytek (Lbt) 0 (?%);
|
2020 |
SPI |
54% |
Kirsten Baesler* (R) |
192,835 |
59.1% |
Brandt Dick (R) |
130,280 |
39.9% |
3,005 |
0.9% |
326,120 |
[-] Other candidates in 2020:
|
2020 |
TRE |
57% |
Thomas Beadle (R) |
227,583 |
65.6% |
Mark Haugen (D) |
117,790 |
34.0% |
1,533 |
0.4% |
346,906 |
[-] Other candidates in 2020:
|
|
2018 |
AG |
54% |
Wayne Stenehjem* (R) |
215,633 |
67.6% |
David Thompson (D) |
102,869 |
32.2% |
715 |
0.2% |
319,217 |
[-] Other candidates in 2018:
|
2018 |
AGR |
54% |
Doug Goehring* (R) |
213,689 |
67.8% |
Jim Dotzenrod (D) |
100,914 |
32.0% |
656 |
0.2% |
315,259 |
[-] Other candidates in 2018:
|
2018 |
SOS |
52% |
Al Jaeger* (I) |
145,275 |
47.3% |
Josh Boschee (D) |
120,475 |
39.2% |
41,527 [+] |
13.5% |
307,277 |
[-] Other candidates in 2018:
Michael Coachman (I) 40,590 (13.2%);
|
2018 |
TAX |
53% |
Ryan Rauschenberger* (R) |
183,283 |
58.6% |
Kylie Oversen (D) |
128,806 |
41.2% |
684 |
0.2% |
312,773 |
[-] Other candidates in 2018:
|
|
2016 |
AUD |
54% |
Josh Gallion (R) |
236,751 |
77.0% |
Roland Riemers (Lbt) |
70,818 |
23.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
307,569 |
[-] Other candidates in 2016:
|
2016 |
INS |
56% |
Jon Godfread (R) |
206,067 |
64.4% |
Ruth Buffalo (D) |
85,696 |
26.8% |
28,176 [+] |
8.8% |
319,939 |
[-] Other candidates in 2016:
Nick Bata (Lbt) 27,642 (8.6%);
|
2016 |
LG |
0% |
Brent Sanford (R) |
0 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
[-] Other candidates in 2016:
Joshua Voytek (Lbt) 0 (?%);
|
2016 |
SPI |
52% |
Kirsten Baesler* (R) |
220,079 |
74.6% |
Joe Chiang (R) |
73,350 |
24.9% |
1,598 |
0.5% |
295,027 |
[-] Other candidates in 2016:
|
2016 |
TRE |
57% |
Kelly Schmidt* (R) |
204,733 |
63.0% |
Tim Mathern (D) |
95,191 |
29.3% |
25,230 [+] |
7.8% |
325,154 |
[-] Other candidates in 2016:
Eric Olson (Lbt) 24,829 (7.6%);
|
|
2014 |
AG |
44% |
Wayne Stenehjem* (R) |
181,678 |
74.1% |
Kiara Kraus-Parr (D) |
63,255 |
25.8% |
395 |
0.2% |
245,328 |
[-] Other candidates in 2014:
|
2014 |
AGR |
44% |
Doug Goehring* (R) |
139,597 |
57.0% |
Ryan Taylor (D) |
105,094 |
42.9% |
377 |
0.2% |
245,068 |
[-] Other candidates in 2014:
|
2014 |
SOS |
44% |
Al Jaeger* (R) |
152,085 |
62.4% |
April Fairfield (D) |
78,474 |
32.2% |
13,198 [+] |
5.4% |
243,757 |
[-] Other candidates in 2014:
Roland Riemers (Lbt) 12,920 (5.3%);
|
2014 |
TAX |
43% |
Ryan Rauschenberger* (R) |
135,329 |
56.8% |
Jason Astrup (D) |
87,516 |
36.7% |
15,582 [+] |
6.5% |
238,427 |
[-] Other candidates in 2014:
Anthony Mangnall (Lbt) 15,238 (6.4%);
|
|
2012 |
AUD |
56% |
Bob Peterson* (R) |
188,359 |
62.4% |
Scott Kelsh (D) |
112,803 |
37.4% |
515 |
0.2% |
301,677 |
[-] Other candidates in 2012:
|
2012 |
INS |
56% |
Adam Hamm* (R) |
192,031 |
63.2% |
Thomas Potter (D) |
111,099 |
36.6% |
483 |
0.2% |
303,613 |
[-] Other candidates in 2012:
|
2012 |
LG |
0% |
Drew Wrigley* (R) |
0 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
[-] Other candidates in 2012:
Michael Coachman (I) 0 (?%);
Anthony Johns (I) 0 (?%);
|
2012 |
SPI |
52% |
Kirsten Baesler (R) |
154,177 |
55.1% |
Tracy Potter (D) |
124,807 |
44.6% |
1,069 |
0.4% |
280,053 |
[-] Other candidates in 2012:
|
2012 |
TRE |
56% |
Kelly Schmidt* (R) |
197,041 |
65.8% |
Ross Mushik (D) |
101,795 |
34.0% |
470 |
0.2% |
299,306 |
[-] Other candidates in 2012:
|
|
2010 |
AG |
45% |
Wayne Stenehjem* (R) |
175,627 |
74.6% |
Jeanette Boechler (D) |
59,781 |
25.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
235,408 |
[-] Other candidates in 2010:
|
2010 |
AGR |
44% |
Doug Goehring* (R) |
157,641 |
68.0% |
Merle Boucher (D) |
73,999 |
31.9% |
216 |
0.1% |
231,856 |
[-] Other candidates in 2010:
|
2010 |
SOS |
45% |
Al Jaeger* (R) |
145,882 |
62.4% |
Corey Mock (D) |
87,519 |
37.5% |
222 |
0.1% |
233,623 |
[-] Other candidates in 2010:
|
2010 |
TAX |
44% |
Cory Fong* (R) |
156,520 |
67.4% |
Cynthia Kaldor (D) |
67,856 |
29.2% |
7,876 [+] |
3.4% |
232,252 |
[-] Other candidates in 2010:
Richard Flattum-Riemers (Lbt) 7,876 (3.4%);
|
|
2008 |
AUD |
59% |
Bob Peterson* (R) |
179,542 |
60.7% |
Daryl Splichal (D) |
116,060 |
39.3% |
0 |
0.0% |
295,602 |
[-] Other candidates in 2008:
|
2008 |
INS |
60% |
Adam Hamm (R) |
151,019 |
50.3% |
Jasper Schneider (D) |
149,186 |
49.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
300,205 |
[-] Other candidates in 2008:
|
2008 |
LG |
0% |
Jack Dalrymple* (R) |
0 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
[-] Other candidates in 2008:
Dana Brandenburg (I) 0 (?%);
|
2008 |
SPI |
57% |
Wayne Sanstead* (D) |
158,776 |
55.3% |
Max Laird (D) |
128,194 |
44.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
286,970 |
[-] Other candidates in 2008:
|
2008 |
TRE |
59% |
Kelly Schmidt* (R) |
180,467 |
61.4% |
Mitch Vance (D) |
113,215 |
38.6% |
0 |
0.0% |
293,682 |
[-] Other candidates in 2008:
|
|
2006 |
AG |
43% |
Wayne Stenehjem* (R) |
147,994 |
68.9% |
Bill Brudvik (D) |
66,943 |
31.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
214,937 |
[-] Other candidates in 2006:
|
2006 |
AGR |
43% |
Roger Johnson* (D) |
119,650 |
55.8% |
Doug Goehring (R) |
94,602 |
44.2% |
0 |
0.0% |
214,252 |
[-] Other candidates in 2006:
|
2006 |
SOS |
43% |
Al Jaeger* (R) |
115,341 |
53.9% |
Kristin Hedger (D) |
98,583 |
46.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
213,924 |
[-] Other candidates in 2006:
|
2006 |
TAX |
43% |
Cory Fong* (R) |
112,154 |
53.1% |
Brent Edison (D) |
99,243 |
46.9% |
0 |
0.0% |
211,397 |
[-] Other candidates in 2006:
|
|
2004 |
AG |
61% |
Wayne Stenehjem* (R) |
217,974 |
72.5% |
Bruce Schoenwald (D) |
82,515 |
27.5% |
0 |
0.0% |
300,489 |
[-] Other candidates in 2004:
|
2004 |
AGR |
60% |
Roger Johnson* (D) |
149,472 |
50.3% |
Doug Goehring (R) |
147,599 |
49.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
297,071 |
[-] Other candidates in 2004:
|
2004 |
AUD |
60% |
Bob Peterson* (R) |
188,579 |
64.3% |
Brent Edison (D) |
104,556 |
35.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
293,135 |
[-] Other candidates in 2004:
|
2004 |
INS |
60% |
Jim Poolman* (R) |
189,383 |
64.4% |
Terry Barnes (D) |
104,847 |
35.6% |
0 |
0.0% |
294,230 |
[-] Other candidates in 2004:
|
2004 |
LG |
0% |
Jack Dalrymple* (R) |
0 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
[-] Other candidates in 2004:
Mitch Sanderson (I) 0 (?%);
|
2004 |
SOS |
60% |
Al Jaeger* (R) |
192,486 |
65.1% |
Doug Melby (D) |
102,966 |
34.9% |
0 |
0.0% |
295,452 |
[-] Other candidates in 2004:
|
2004 |
SPI |
58% |
Wayne Sanstead* (D) |
174,230 |
61.6% |
Keith Jacobson (R) |
108,543 |
38.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
282,773 |
[-] Other candidates in 2004:
|
2004 |
TAX |
61% |
Rick Clayburgh* (R) |
206,772 |
69.2% |
Mike Every (D) |
92,171 |
30.8% |
0 |
0.0% |
298,943 |
[-] Other candidates in 2004:
|
2004 |
TRE |
60% |
Kelly Schmidt (R) |
165,254 |
56.3% |
Dean Meyer (D) |
128,122 |
43.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
293,376 |
[-] Other candidates in 2004:
|
|
2000 |
AG |
59% |
Wayne Stenehjem (R) |
157,986 |
55.7% |
Glenn Pomeroy (D) |
125,466 |
44.3% |
0 |
0.0% |
283,452 |
[-] Other candidates in 2000:
|
2000 |
AGR |
57% |
Roger Johnson* (D) |
150,663 |
55.1% |
Clare Carlson (R) |
122,804 |
44.9% |
0 |
0.0% |
273,467 |
[-] Other candidates in 2000:
|
2000 |
AUD |
57% |
Bob Peterson* (R) |
165,026 |
60.6% |
Mary Ekstrom (D) |
107,505 |
39.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
272,531 |
[-] Other candidates in 2000:
|
2000 |
INS |
57% |
Jim Poolman (R) |
144,982 |
53.3% |
Gorman King (D) |
127,223 |
46.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
272,205 |
[-] Other candidates in 2000:
|
2000 |
LG |
0% |
Jack Dalrymple (R) |
0 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
[-] Other candidates in 2000:
|
2000 |
SOS |
57% |
Al Jaeger* (R) |
178,950 |
65.6% |
Dennis Bercier (D) |
94,024 |
34.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
272,974 |
[-] Other candidates in 2000:
|
2000 |
SPI |
55% |
Wayne Sanstead* (D) |
160,799 |
60.6% |
Ray Holmberg (R) |
104,422 |
39.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
265,221 |
[-] Other candidates in 2000:
|
2000 |
TAX |
57% |
Rick Clayburgh* (R) |
169,710 |
61.9% |
Steve Tomac (D) |
104,551 |
38.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
274,261 |
[-] Other candidates in 2000:
|
2000 |
TRE |
57% |
Kathi Gilmore* (D) |
138,538 |
50.7% |
Randy Schobinger (R) |
134,487 |
49.3% |
0 |
0.0% |
273,025 |
[-] Other candidates in 2000:
|
|
1996 |
AG |
56% |
Heidi Heitkamp* (D) |
167,863 |
63.8% |
Ward Johnson (R) |
95,164 |
36.2% |
0 |
0.0% |
263,027 |
[-] Other candidates in 1996:
|
1996 |
AGR |
56% |
Roger Johnson (D) |
129,423 |
50.1% |
Dina Butcher (R) |
129,140 |
49.9% |
0 |
0.0% |
258,563 |
[-] Other candidates in 1996:
|
1996 |
AUD |
55% |
Bob Peterson (R) |
140,596 |
54.6% |
Shirley Dykshoorn (D) |
116,864 |
45.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
257,460 |
[-] Other candidates in 1996:
|
1996 |
INS |
56% |
Glenn Pomeroy* (D) |
146,308 |
56.3% |
Claus Lembke (R) |
98,275 |
37.8% |
15,305 [+] |
5.9% |
259,888 |
[-] Other candidates in 1996:
Jan Shelver (I) 15,305 (5.9%);
|
1996 |
LG |
0% |
Rosemarie Myrdal* (R) |
0 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
[-] Other candidates in 1996:
|
1996 |
SOS |
55% |
Al Jaeger* (R) |
149,344 |
58.6% |
Shelley Seeberg (D) |
105,419 |
41.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
254,763 |
[-] Other candidates in 1996:
|
1996 |
SPI |
53% |
Wayne Sanstead* (D) |
147,213 |
59.2% |
Ray Holmberg (R) |
101,355 |
40.8% |
0 |
0.0% |
248,568 |
[-] Other candidates in 1996:
|
1996 |
TAX |
56% |
Rick Clayburgh (R) |
132,986 |
51.4% |
Robert Hanson* (D) |
125,527 |
48.6% |
0 |
0.0% |
258,513 |
[-] Other candidates in 1996:
|
1996 |
TRE |
55% |
Kathi Gilmore* (D) |
138,616 |
54.5% |
Randy Schobinger (R) |
115,750 |
45.5% |
0 |
0.0% |
254,366 |
[-] Other candidates in 1996:
|
|
1992 |
AG |
64% |
Heidi Heitkamp (D) |
186,606 |
62.4% |
Warren Albrecht (R) |
112,562 |
37.6% |
0 |
0.0% |
299,168 |
[-] Other candidates in 1992:
|
1992 |
AGR |
64% |
Sarah Vogel* (D) |
170,237 |
57.2% |
Bill Bowman (R) |
114,892 |
38.6% |
12,708 [+] |
4.3% |
297,837 |
[-] Other candidates in 1992:
Andy Heinze (I) 12,708 (4.3%);
|
1992 |
AUD |
62% |
Robert Peterson* (R) |
181,459 |
63.0% |
Mike Puklich (D) |
106,538 |
37.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
287,997 |
[-] Other candidates in 1992:
|
1992 |
INS |
64% |
Glenn Pomeroy (D) |
161,349 |
54.1% |
Kent Olson (R) |
120,383 |
40.4% |
16,295 [+] |
5.5% |
298,027 |
[-] Other candidates in 1992:
Jan Shelver (I) 16,295 (5.5%);
|
1992 |
LG |
0% |
Rosemarie Myrdal (R) |
0 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
[-] Other candidates in 1992:
Marj Sandry (I) 0 (?%);
Jerry Scott (I) 0 (?%);
|
1992 |
SOS |
63% |
Al Jaeger (R) |
151,864 |
52.1% |
Jim Kusler* (D) |
139,860 |
47.9% |
0 |
0.0% |
291,724 |
[-] Other candidates in 1992:
|
1992 |
SPI |
60% |
Wayne Sanstead* (D) |
219,906 |
78.5% |
Len Martin (I) |
60,124 |
21.5% |
0 |
0.0% |
280,030 |
[-] Other candidates in 1992:
|
1992 |
TAX |
63% |
Robert Hanson (D) |
147,106 |
50.2% |
Rod Backman (R) |
146,220 |
49.8% |
0 |
0.0% |
293,326 |
[-] Other candidates in 1992:
|
1992 |
TRE |
62% |
Kathi Gilmore (D) |
148,889 |
51.5% |
Claus Lembke (R) |
140,440 |
48.5% |
0 |
0.0% |
289,329 |
[-] Other candidates in 1992:
|
|
1988 |
AG |
63% |
Nicholas Spaeth* (D) |
213,554 |
73.3% |
John Gosbee (R) |
77,906 |
26.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
291,460 |
[-] Other candidates in 1988:
|
1988 |
AGR |
64% |
Sarah Vogel (D) |
132,959 |
45.2% |
Keith Bjerke (R) |
115,817 |
39.3% |
45,615 [+] |
15.5% |
294,391 |
[-] Other candidates in 1988:
Kent Jones* (I) 41,386 (14.1%);
Harley McLain (I) 4,229 (1.4%);
|
1988 |
AUD |
62% |
Robert Peterson* (R) |
146,718 |
51.3% |
Steve Pederson (D) |
139,230 |
48.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
285,948 |
[-] Other candidates in 1988:
|
1988 |
INS |
63% |
Earl Pomeroy* (D) |
196,092 |
67.8% |
Margaret Bushee (R) |
93,122 |
32.2% |
0 |
0.0% |
289,214 |
[-] Other candidates in 1988:
|
1988 |
LG |
0% |
Lloyd Omdahl* (D) |
0 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
[-] Other candidates in 1988:
|
1988 |
SOS |
62% |
Jim Kusler (D) |
148,150 |
52.2% |
Dave Koland (R) |
135,836 |
47.8% |
0 |
0.0% |
283,986 |
[-] Other candidates in 1988:
|
1988 |
SPI |
54% |
Wayne Sanstead* (D) |
246,173 |
100.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
246,173 |
[-] Other candidates in 1988:
|
1988 |
TAX |
64% |
Heidi Heitkamp* (D) |
192,914 |
65.8% |
Marshall Moore (R) |
100,279 |
34.2% |
0 |
0.0% |
293,193 |
[-] Other candidates in 1988:
|
1988 |
TRE |
62% |
Robert Hanson* (D) |
156,896 |
54.8% |
Steve Easton (R) |
129,325 |
45.2% |
0 |
0.0% |
286,221 |
[-] Other candidates in 1988:
|
|
1984 |
AG |
66% |
Nicholas Spaeth (D) |
200,731 |
65.2% |
Robert Wefald* (R) |
107,191 |
34.8% |
0 |
0.0% |
307,922 |
[-] Other candidates in 1984:
|
1984 |
AGR |
65% |
Kent Jones* (R) |
183,276 |
61.0% |
Bruce Larson (D) |
117,088 |
39.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
300,364 |
[-] Other candidates in 1984:
|
1984 |
AUD |
65% |
Robert Peterson* (R) |
161,908 |
54.1% |
Heidi Heitkamp (D) |
137,570 |
45.9% |
0 |
0.0% |
299,478 |
[-] Other candidates in 1984:
|
1984 |
INS |
65% |
Earl Pomeroy (D) |
157,542 |
52.3% |
Diane Alm (R) |
133,153 |
44.2% |
10,378 [+] |
3.4% |
301,073 |
[-] Other candidates in 1984:
Jan Gerhart-Shelver (I) 10,378 (3.4%);
|
1984 |
LG |
0% |
Ruth Meiers (D) |
0 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
[-] Other candidates in 1984:
|
1984 |
SOS |
66% |
Ben Meier* (R) |
154,665 |
50.9% |
Byron Knutson (D) |
140,191 |
46.1% |
9,034 [+] |
3.0% |
303,890 |
[-] Other candidates in 1984:
Claire Edwin Blomquist (I) 9,034 (3.0%);
|
1984 |
SPI |
62% |
Wayne Sanstead (D) |
221,824 |
77.8% |
Larry Nudell (I) |
63,310 |
22.2% |
0 |
0.0% |
285,134 |
[-] Other candidates in 1984:
|
1984 |
TAX |
178% |
Kent Conrad* (D) |
230,675 |
27.9% |
Scott Hove (I) |
595,040 |
72.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
825,715 |
[-] Other candidates in 1984:
|
1984 |
TRE |
64% |
Robert Hanson (D) |
149,689 |
50.5% |
John Lesmeister* (R) |
146,837 |
49.5% |
0 |
0.0% |
296,526 |
[-] Other candidates in 1984:
|
|
1980 |
AG |
62% |
Robert Wefald (R) |
149,189 |
51.9% |
Alice Olson (D) |
138,092 |
48.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
287,281 |
[-] Other candidates in 1980:
|
1980 |
AGR |
60% |
Kent Jones (R) |
147,329 |
52.2% |
Buckshot Hoffner (D) |
134,993 |
47.8% |
0 |
0.0% |
282,322 |
[-] Other candidates in 1980:
|
1980 |
AUD |
59% |
Robert Peterson* (R) |
171,526 |
61.8% |
Jim Engel (D) |
106,115 |
38.2% |
0 |
0.0% |
277,641 |
[-] Other candidates in 1980:
|
1980 |
INS |
62% |
Jorris Wigen (R) |
172,172 |
59.7% |
Byron Knutson* (D) |
116,021 |
40.3% |
0 |
0.0% |
288,193 |
[-] Other candidates in 1980:
|
1980 |
LG |
0% |
Ernest Sands (R) |
0 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
[-] Other candidates in 1980:
|
1980 |
SOS |
60% |
Ben Meier* (R) |
192,609 |
69.0% |
Ella Ombolt (D) |
86,622 |
31.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
279,231 |
[-] Other candidates in 1980:
|
1980 |
SPI |
58% |
Joe Crawford (I) |
154,221 |
57.0% |
Howard Snortland* (I) |
116,510 |
43.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
270,731 |
[-] Other candidates in 1980:
|
1980 |
TAX |
57% |
Kent Conrad (D) |
180,360 |
68.1% |
John Korsmo (R) |
84,547 |
31.9% |
0 |
0.0% |
264,907 |
[-] Other candidates in 1980:
|
1980 |
TRE |
59% |
John Lesmeister (R) |
138,314 |
50.3% |
Robert Hanson (D) |
136,523 |
49.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
274,837 |
[-] Other candidates in 1980:
|
|
1976 |
AG |
65% |
Allen Olson* (R) |
141,998 |
51.8% |
Kent Johanneson (D) |
132,300 |
48.2% |
0 |
0.0% |
274,298 |
[-] Other candidates in 1976:
|
1976 |
AGR |
64% |
Myron Just (D) |
171,503 |
63.3% |
Robert Nasset (R) |
96,461 |
35.6% |
3,069 [+] |
1.1% |
271,033 |
[-] Other candidates in 1976:
Berger Rodne (Amer) 3,069 (1.1%);
|
1976 |
AUD |
63% |
Robert Peterson* (R) |
134,863 |
50.8% |
Kent Conrad (D) |
130,864 |
49.2% |
0 |
0.0% |
265,727 |
[-] Other candidates in 1976:
|
1976 |
INS |
63% |
Byron Knutson (D) |
146,941 |
54.9% |
Jorris Wigen* (R) |
120,857 |
45.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
267,798 |
[-] Other candidates in 1976:
|
1976 |
LG |
0% |
Wayne Sanstead* (R) |
0 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
[-] Other candidates in 1976:
Truman Wold (Amer) 0 (?%);
|
1976 |
SOS |
64% |
Ben Meier* (R) |
150,864 |
55.7% |
Maggie Feigin (D) |
120,067 |
44.3% |
0 |
0.0% |
270,931 |
[-] Other candidates in 1976:
|
1976 |
SPI |
58% |
Howard Snortland (I) |
124,137 |
50.3% |
Joe Crawford (I) |
122,488 |
49.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
246,625 |
[-] Other candidates in 1976:
|
1976 |
TAX |
63% |
Byron Dorgan* (D) |
210,311 |
79.3% |
Kermit Schauer (I) |
54,968 |
20.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
265,279 |
[-] Other candidates in 1976:
|
1976 |
TRE |
64% |
Walter Christensen* (D) |
155,214 |
57.6% |
Bernice Asbridge (R) |
114,298 |
42.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
269,512 |
[-] Other candidates in 1976:
|
|
1972 |
AG |
62% |
Allen Olson (R) |
148,789 |
58.0% |
Joseph Vogel (D) |
107,903 |
42.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
256,692 |
[-] Other candidates in 1972:
|
1972 |
AGR |
62% |
Arne Dahl* (R) |
145,175 |
56.6% |
Andrew Headland (D) |
111,441 |
43.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
256,616 |
[-] Other candidates in 1972:
|
1972 |
AUD |
61% |
Robert Peterson (R) |
159,692 |
63.5% |
Pam Pokorny (D) |
91,727 |
36.5% |
0 |
0.0% |
251,419 |
[-] Other candidates in 1972:
|
1972 |
INS |
60% |
Jorris Wigen* (R) |
145,891 |
59.0% |
Bernard Majors (D) |
101,586 |
41.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
247,477 |
[-] Other candidates in 1972:
|
1972 |
LG |
64% |
Wayne Sanstead (D) |
133,443 |
50.3% |
I.J. Wilhite (R) |
131,719 |
49.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
265,162 |
[-] Other candidates in 1972:
|
1972 |
SOS |
62% |
Ben Meier* (R) |
170,765 |
66.7% |
Daniel Rylance (D) |
85,277 |
33.3% |
0 |
0.0% |
256,042 |
[-] Other candidates in 1972:
|
1972 |
SPI |
58% |
Marvell Peterson* (I) |
158,905 |
66.1% |
Karl Maurer (I) |
81,654 |
33.9% |
0 |
0.0% |
240,559 |
[-] Other candidates in 1972:
|
1972 |
TAX |
58% |
Byron Dorgan* (D) |
161,011 |
67.2% |
Richard Lommen (I) |
78,448 |
32.8% |
0 |
0.0% |
239,459 |
[-] Other candidates in 1972:
|
1972 |
TRE |
62% |
Walter Christensen (D) |
130,211 |
50.9% |
Bernice Asbridge* (R) |
125,856 |
49.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
256,067 |
[-] Other candidates in 1972:
|
|
1968 |
AG |
65% |
Helgi Johanneson* (R) |
130,737 |
56.9% |
Tom Burgum (D) |
99,080 |
43.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
229,817 |
[-] Other candidates in 1968:
|
1968 |
AGR |
64% |
Arne Dahl* (R) |
136,699 |
60.4% |
Russell Belquist (D) |
86,053 |
38.0% |
3,536 [+] |
1.6% |
226,288 |
[-] Other candidates in 1968:
James Kent (I) 3,536 (1.6%);
|
1968 |
AUD |
64% |
Curtis Olson* (R) |
142,182 |
62.5% |
Duke Ellingson (D) |
82,021 |
36.1% |
3,222 [+] |
1.4% |
227,425 |
[-] Other candidates in 1968:
James Ueckert (I) 3,222 (1.4%);
|
1968 |
INS |
63% |
Jorris Wigen (R) |
111,560 |
49.8% |
Kelly Nygaard* (D) |
108,695 |
48.6% |
3,561 [+] |
1.6% |
223,816 |
[-] Other candidates in 1968:
Bill Baker (I) 3,561 (1.6%);
|
1968 |
LG |
66% |
Richard Larsen (R) |
121,853 |
52.1% |
Charles Tighe* (D) |
108,647 |
46.4% |
3,447 [+] |
1.5% |
233,947 |
[-] Other candidates in 1968:
Arthur Bilden (I) 3,447 (1.5%);
|
1968 |
SOS |
65% |
Ben Meier* (R) |
147,121 |
64.3% |
Clara Wheelihan (D) |
78,175 |
34.2% |
3,341 [+] |
1.5% |
228,637 |
[-] Other candidates in 1968:
Vaughn Braddock (I) 3,341 (1.5%);
|
1968 |
SPI |
60% |
Marvell Peterson* (I) |
150,562 |
71.3% |
Karl Maurer (I) |
60,577 |
28.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
211,139 |
[-] Other candidates in 1968:
|
1968 |
TAX |
59% |
Edwin Sjaastad* (I) |
109,039 |
52.5% |
Dean Miller (R) |
98,460 |
47.4% |
9 |
0.0% |
207,508 |
[-] Other candidates in 1968:
|
1968 |
TRE |
64% |
Bernice Asbridge (R) |
113,692 |
50.5% |
Walter Christensen* (D) |
107,953 |
48.0% |
3,379 [+] |
1.5% |
225,024 |
[-] Other candidates in 1968:
A.L. Buck (I) 3,379 (1.5%);
|
|
1964 |
AG |
69% |
Helgi Johanneson* (R) |
124,112 |
50.9% |
Lee Fraase (D) |
119,621 |
49.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
243,733 |
[-] Other candidates in 1964:
|
1964 |
AGR |
69% |
Arne Dahl (R) |
126,483 |
52.0% |
Isak Hystad (D) |
116,719 |
48.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
243,202 |
[-] Other candidates in 1964:
|
1964 |
AUD |
69% |
Curtis Olson* (R) |
128,495 |
52.3% |
Ted Miller (D) |
117,056 |
47.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
245,551 |
[-] Other candidates in 1964:
|
1964 |
INS |
69% |
Kelly Nygaard (D) |
129,689 |
53.2% |
Ted Weisenburger (R) |
114,094 |
46.8% |
0 |
0.0% |
243,783 |
[-] Other candidates in 1964:
|
1964 |
LG |
69% |
Charles Tighe (D) |
126,627 |
51.8% |
Frank Wenstrom* (R) |
117,949 |
48.2% |
0 |
0.0% |
244,576 |
[-] Other candidates in 1964:
|
1964 |
SOS |
69% |
Ben Meier* (R) |
128,170 |
52.2% |
Elmer Strand (D) |
117,468 |
47.8% |
0 |
0.0% |
245,638 |
[-] Other candidates in 1964:
|
1964 |
SPI |
65% |
Marvell Peterson* (I) |
155,676 |
67.7% |
Craig Gannon (I) |
74,397 |
32.3% |
0 |
0.0% |
230,073 |
[-] Other candidates in 1964:
|
1964 |
TAX |
66% |
Lloyd Omdahl* (D) |
136,792 |
58.0% |
John Erickson (R) |
99,011 |
42.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
235,803 |
[-] Other candidates in 1964:
|
1964 |
TRE |
69% |
Walter Christensen (D) |
124,068 |
51.0% |
Phil Hoghaug* (R) |
119,438 |
49.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
243,506 |
[-] Other candidates in 1964:
|
|
1962 |
AG |
60% |
Helgi Johanneson (R) |
114,991 |
54.1% |
Charles Tighe (D) |
97,598 |
45.9% |
0 |
0.0% |
212,589 |
[-] Other candidates in 1962:
|
1962 |
AGR |
61% |
Math Dahl* (R) |
117,012 |
54.1% |
Harold Hansen (D) |
99,447 |
45.9% |
0 |
0.0% |
216,459 |
[-] Other candidates in 1962:
|
1962 |
AUD |
61% |
Curtis Olson* (R) |
121,842 |
56.3% |
Florence Swenson (D) |
94,434 |
43.7% |
0 |
0.0% |
216,276 |
[-] Other candidates in 1962:
|
1962 |
INS |
59% |
Frank Albers (R) |
112,946 |
53.8% |
Hans Walker (D) |
96,928 |
46.2% |
0 |
0.0% |
209,874 |
[-] Other candidates in 1962:
|
1962 |
LG |
60% |
Frank Wenstrom (R) |
112,704 |
52.9% |
Lee Fraase (D) |
100,349 |
47.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
213,053 |
[-] Other candidates in 1962:
|
1962 |
SOS |
61% |
Ben Meier* (R) |
120,314 |
55.8% |
Larry Schneider (D) |
95,205 |
44.2% |
0 |
0.0% |
215,519 |
[-] Other candidates in 1962:
|
1962 |
SPI |
49% |
Marvell Peterson* (I) |
175,919 |
100.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
175,919 |
[-] Other candidates in 1962:
|
1962 |
TRE |
60% |
Phil Hoghaug (R) |
113,886 |
53.5% |
Elmer Strand (D) |
99,159 |
46.5% |
0 |
0.0% |
213,045 |
[-] Other candidates in 1962:
|
|
1960 |
AG |
73% |
Leslie Burgum* (R) |
145,116 |
56.0% |
Charles Murphy (D) |
114,178 |
44.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
259,294 |
[-] Other candidates in 1960:
|
1960 |
AGR |
73% |
Math Dahl* (R) |
142,074 |
54.8% |
Bruce Hagen (D) |
117,303 |
45.2% |
0 |
0.0% |
259,377 |
[-] Other candidates in 1960:
|
1960 |
AUD |
72% |
Curtis Olson* (R) |
140,334 |
54.6% |
Weldon Haugen (D) |
116,855 |
45.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
257,189 |
[-] Other candidates in 1960:
|
1960 |
INS |
71% |
A.J. Jensen* (R) |
144,295 |
56.6% |
Don Sloan (D) |
110,460 |
43.4% |
0 |
0.0% |
254,755 |
[-] Other candidates in 1960:
|
1960 |
LG |
72% |
Orville Hagen (R) |
135,365 |
52.5% |
Lavern Schoder (D) |
122,388 |
47.5% |
0 |
0.0% |
257,753 |
[-] Other candidates in 1960:
|
1960 |
SOS |
72% |
Ben Meier* (R) |
139,927 |
54.4% |
Lloyd Omdahl (D) |
117,138 |
45.6% |
0 |
0.0% |
257,065 |
[-] Other candidates in 1960:
|
1960 |
SPI |
60% |
Marvell Peterson* (I) |
214,535 |
100.0% |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0% |
214,535 |
[-] Other candidates in 1960:
|
1960 |
TAX |
68% |
Arthur Engen* (D) |
169,774 |
70.4% |
John Leier (I) |
71,428 |
29.6% |
0 |
0.0% |
241,202 |
[-] Other candidates in 1960:
|
1960 |
TRE |
71% |
John Erickson* (R) |
140,041 |
54.9% |
Albert Heide (D) |
114,954 |
45.1% |
0 |
0.0% |
254,995 |
[-] Other candidates in 1960:
|
|
1958 |
AUD |
53% |
Curtis Olson* (R) |
106,975 |
54.4% |
Weldon Haugen (D) |
89,787 |
45.6% |
0 |
0.0% |
196,762 |
[-] Other candidates in 1958:
|
|
1956 |
TAX |
61% |
Arthur Engen* (D) |
117,800 |
52.1% |
John Leier (I) |
108,227 |
47.9% |
0 |
0.0% |
226,027 |
[-] Other candidates in 1956:
|